Question 7.

From the passage, we can infer that the author is in favour of:
A
greater multilingualism.
B
“language shifts” across languages.
C
cultural homogenisation.
D
an expanded state role in the preservation of languages.

Question Explanation

Text Explanation

Multilingualism can help us live in a more connected and more interdependent world.

Throughout the passage, the author is advocating for greater language diversity and suggesting how to counter the threat to the same. Multilingualism is something that the author has supported as cited above. Hence, Option A is the answer.

More commonly, speakers live on but abandon their language in favor of another vernacular, a widespread process that linguists refer to as “language shift” from which few languages are immune.

Since the author advocated the preservation of languages, he would likely be against this shift, as it endangers languages. Option B can be eliminated.

Again, the author is pushing for more diversity and preservation of cultures instead of homogenization of the same. Option C can be eliminated.

The author does not push for state intervention in the preservation of languages. Hence, Option D would not be the answer.

Video Explanation
No video explanation yet — we're on it and uploading soon!
XAT 2026 Full Course - Enroll Now for Best XAT Preparation
CAT LRDI 100 Recorded Course - Master Logical Reasoning and Data Interpretation
HOME
XAT Sankalp Sale
Quant Revision Book
More
YoutubeWhatsapp