Question 24.

The contrasting reactions to the Chinese and Israeli “contaminations” of lunar space
A
are valid as the contamination of the lunar environment from animal sources is far greater than from plants.
B
are evidence of China’s reasonable approach towards space contamination.
C
indicate that national scientists may have different sensitivities to issues of biosphere protection.
D
reveal global biases prevalent in attitudes towards different countries.
Previous Question
Rate this Solution

Question Explanation

Text Explanation

The passage highlights contrasting reactions to two instances of potential contamination of the lunar environment: China’s germination of a plant seed on the Moon, which elicited little controversy, and Israel’s accidental release of tardigrades aboard the Beresheet probe, which sparked significant backlash within the space community. This contrast underscores differences in how national or regional scientific communities respond to issues of planetary protection. Option C most closely reflects this idea.

The passage does not suggest that contamination from animals is inherently more harmful than from plants, as suggested in Option A. Similarly, Option B inaccurately implies that the passage endorses China’s approach as inherently “reasonable,” which it does not. Option D diverges a bit from the discussion by emphasising global biases against specific countries, but the passage provides no evidence of such biases, focusing instead on scientific reactions.

Video Explanation
No video explanation yet — we're on it and uploading soon!
XAT 2026 Full Course - Enroll Now for Best XAT Preparation
CAT LRDI 100 Recorded Course - Master Logical Reasoning and Data Interpretation
HOME
XAT Sankalp Sale
Quant Revision Book
More
YoutubeWhatsapp