Question 13.

All of the following statements can be inferred from the passage EXCEPT that:
A
sentences do not always have to be complete.
B
the subject-predicate relation is the same as the noun-verb relation.
C
the primary purpose of grammar is to ensure that sentences remain simple.
D
“Grammar Police” is a metaphor for critics who focus on linguistic rules.

Question Explanation

Text Explanation

Option A: This can be inferred from "...Must you write complete sentences each time, every time? Perish the thought. If your work consists only of fragments and floating clauses, the Grammar Police aren’t going to come and take you away..." The author presents an illustration to show how a simple combination of a noun and verb forms a complete expression.

Option B: Based on the limited information available from the passage, we can make this inference from "...no group of words can be a sentence, since a sentence is, by definition, a group of words containing a subject (noun) and a predicate (verb)..."

Option C: The author does not make any such claim. Grammar serves as a mechanism to organize communication and avoid confusion. However, the "primary purpose" of grammar is not to ensure that sentences remain "simple". Since we cannot infer this statement from the passage, it is the correct answer.

Option D: Although not explicitly mentioned, we can understand the sentiment behind using the term "Grammar Police". The author is using this as a metaphor for the strong adherents of the grammatic rules (who are perhaps swift to judge and criticize).

Therefore, we can infer all of the statements except for the one in Option C.

Video Explanation
No video explanation yet — we're on it and uploading soon!
XAT 2026 Full Course - Enroll Now for Best XAT Preparation
CAT LRDI 100 Recorded Course - Master Logical Reasoning and Data Interpretation
HOME
XAT Sankalp Sale
Quant Revision Book
More
YoutubeWhatsapp