Instructions
Read the following passage and answer the THREE questions that follow.
What I call fast political thinking is driven by simplified moral frames. These moral frames give us the sense that those who agree with us have the right answer, while those who disagree are unreasonable, or worse.
Each moral frame sets up an axis of favorable and unfavorable. Progressives use the oppressor-oppressed axis. Progressives view most favorably those groups that can be regarded as oppressed or standing with the oppressed, and they view most unfavorably those groups that can be regarded as oppressors. Conservatives use the civilization-barbarism axis. Conservatives view most favorably the institutions that they believe constrain and guide people toward civilized behavior, and they view most unfavorably those people who they see as trying to tear down such institutions. Libertarians use the liberty-coercion axis. Libertarians view most favorably those people who defer to decisions that are made on the basis of personal choice and voluntary agreement, and they view most unfavorably those people who favor government interventions that restrict personal choice.
If you have a dominant axis, I suggest that you try to learn the languages spoken by those who use the other axes. Don’t worry—learning other languages won’t make it easy for others to convert you to their point of view. By the same token, it will not make it easy to convert others to your point of view. However, you may become aware of assumptions your side makes that others might legitimately question.
What learning the other languages can do is enable you to understand how others think about political issues. Instead of resorting to the theory that people with other views are crazy or stupid or evil, you may concede that they have a coherent point of view. In fact, their point of view could be just as coherent as yours. The problem is that those people apply their point of view in circumstances where you are fairly sure that it is not really appropriate.
Consider that there may be situations in which one frame describes the problem much better than the others. For example, I believe that the civil rights movement in the United States is best described using the progressive heuristic of the oppressed and the oppressor. In the 1950s and the early 1960s, the people who had the right model were the people who were fighting for black Americans to have true voting rights, equal access to housing, and an end to the Jim Crow laws. The civilization-barbarism axis and the liberty-coercion axis did not provide the best insight into
the issue….
What I call fast political thinking is driven by simplified moral frames. These moral frames give us the sense that those who agree with us have the right answer, while those who disagree are unreasonable, or worse.
Each moral frame sets up an axis of favorable and unfavorable. Progressives use the oppressor-oppressed axis. Progressives view most favorably those groups that can be regarded as oppressed or standing with the oppressed, and they view most unfavorably those groups that can be regarded as oppressors. Conservatives use the civilization-barbarism axis. Conservatives view most favorably the institutions that they believe constrain and guide people toward civilized behavior, and they view most unfavorably those people who they see as trying to tear down such institutions. Libertarians use the liberty-coercion axis. Libertarians view most favorably those people who defer to decisions that are made on the basis of personal choice and voluntary agreement, and they view most unfavorably those people who favor government interventions that restrict personal choice.
If you have a dominant axis, I suggest that you try to learn the languages spoken by those who use the other axes. Don’t worry—learning other languages won’t make it easy for others to convert you to their point of view. By the same token, it will not make it easy to convert others to your point of view. However, you may become aware of assumptions your side makes that others might legitimately question.
What learning the other languages can do is enable you to understand how others think about political issues. Instead of resorting to the theory that people with other views are crazy or stupid or evil, you may concede that they have a coherent point of view. In fact, their point of view could be just as coherent as yours. The problem is that those people apply their point of view in circumstances where you are fairly sure that it is not really appropriate.
Consider that there may be situations in which one frame describes the problem much better than the others. For example, I believe that the civil rights movement in the United States is best described using the progressive heuristic of the oppressed and the oppressor. In the 1950s and the early 1960s, the people who had the right model were the people who were fighting for black Americans to have true voting rights, equal access to housing, and an end to the Jim Crow laws. The civilization-barbarism axis and the liberty-coercion axis did not provide the best insight into
the issue….
Question 18.
Which of the following BEST describes the civilization-barbarism axis?
A
The way we are trained to behave affects our peace in life
B
Some people are barbaric and should be restrained from public life.
C
It is how you behave, not who you are, that makes you acceptable.
D
Government should play a very heavy role in maintaining law and order.
Question Explanation
Text Explanation
The civilization-barbarism axis, as described in the passage, is best represented by option C: “It is how you behave, not who you are, that makes you acceptable.”
This axis is used by conservatives who view most favourably the institutions that they believe constrain and guide people toward civilized behaviour, and they view most unfavourably those people who they see as trying to tear down such institutions. Therefore, it’s more about behaviour (civilized vs barbaric) than about who the person is.
Options A, B, D and E cannot be inferred from the passage.
Video Explanation
The civilization-barbarism axis, as described in the passage, is best represented by option C: “It is how you behave, not who you are, that makes you acceptable.”
This axis is used by conservatives who view most favourably the institutions that they believe constrain and guide people toward civilized behaviour, and they view most unfavourably those people who they see as trying to tear down such institutions. Therefore, it’s more about behaviour (civilized vs barbaric) than about who the person is.
Options A, B, D and E cannot be inferred from the passage.
No video explanation yet — we're on it and uploading soon!
Master CAT Preparation with Previous Year Papers
Practicing CAT previous year papers is one of the most effective strategies for CAT exam preparation. By solving questions from CAT 2024 valr-slot-1 and other previous years, you can understand the exam pattern, difficulty level, and types of questions asked in the Common Admission Test.
Why Practice CAT Previous Year Questions?
- Understand Exam Pattern: CAT previous papers help you familiarize yourself with the question format, marking scheme, and time management required for the actual exam.
- Identify Important Topics: By analyzing CAT solved questions from multiple years, you can identify frequently asked topics and focus your preparation accordingly.
- Improve Speed and Accuracy: Regular practice of CAT previous year papers enhances your problem-solving speed and accuracy, which are crucial for scoring well in the exam.
- Build Confidence: Solving CAT previous year questions builds confidence and reduces exam anxiety by making you comfortable with the exam format.
How to Use CAT Previous Papers Effectively
- Solve Under Exam Conditions: Attempt CAT previous year papers in a timed environment to simulate the actual exam experience.
- Analyze Your Performance: After solving each CAT previous paper, analyze your mistakes and identify areas that need improvement.
- Review Solutions Thoroughly: Study the detailed solutions and explanations provided for each question to understand the correct approach and methodology.
- Focus on Weak Areas: Use CAT solved questions to identify your weak areas and dedicate more time to improving them.
CAT Exam Sections Covered
Our comprehensive collection of CAT previous papers covers all three sections of the exam:
- VARC (Verbal Ability & Reading Comprehension): Practice reading comprehension passages, para jumbles, and other verbal ability questions from CAT previous years.
- DILR (Data Interpretation & Logical Reasoning): Master DI and LR questions with detailed solutions from CAT previous year papers.
- QA (Quantitative Ability): Solve arithmetic, algebra, geometry, and other quantitative ability questions from CAT solved papers.
Additional CAT Preparation Resources
Looking for more CAT preparation materials? Explore our comprehensive collection of:
- CAT Previous Papers Archive - Access questions from multiple years and slots
- CAT 2024 valr-slot-1 Solved Solutions - Complete slot-wise solutions with explanations
- CAT Preparation Courses - Enroll in structured courses for comprehensive CAT preparation
Note: Regular practice of CAT previous year papers, combined with a structured study plan, is essential for achieving a high percentile in the CAT exam. Make sure to solve questions from all sections and review the solutions thoroughly to maximize your preparation effectiveness.
