D) Option 2 is the correct answer. The sentence before option 2 states "Now, however, we are having the last laugh".&nbsp;The reason they are having the last laugh is given in the sentence,&nbsp;&nbsp;"Science has officially crowned us superior to our early-rising brethren."&nbsp;Therefore, it fits here perfectly forming a coherent paragraph. A) Option&nbsp;4:&nbsp;Placing the sentence here&nbsp;would seem a bit disconnected. The sentence before and after Blank 4 flows continuously and placing the sentence here would break this flow B) Option 3:&nbsp;This placement would&nbsp;disrupt the flow of the sentence before and after Blank 3. The study mentioned before, blank 3, is the moment where the night owl's position is validated, so introducing the idea of "superiority" will be out of place and feel redundant. C)&nbsp;Option 1:&nbsp;It may seem plausible initially, but it&nbsp;would not be right to talk about the claim&nbsp;without first mentioning the negative stereotypes, making this placement less effective.

Sentence 2 is the odd one out.Sequence 1435 forms a coherent paragraph: Sentence 1&nbsp;introduces the debate about gender being influenced by both biological and social factors. It sets the tone for the paragraph, addressing the complexity of gender.Sentence 4&nbsp;follows logically from Sentence 1. After introducing the complexity of gender, it suggests that, even with the acknowledgment of both nature and nurture, researchers studying gender's biological basis still face political challenges.Sentence 3&nbsp;builds on Sentence 4, highlighting why researchers studying the biological aspects of gender face resistance. The public discomfort with viewing gender as more than just a social construct is explained.Sentence 5&nbsp;connects to Sentence 3 by elaborating on the political preference for viewing gender purely as a social construct, reinforcing the challenges faced by researchers advocating for a more nuanced view of gender. Sentence 2&nbsp;doesn't fit in the context of the paragraph. The rest of the sentences are focused on the complexities of gender as a mix of nature and nurture and the political and societal challenges researchers face. Sentence 2 shifts the focus to the issue of sexism, which, while related to gender, does not directly tie into the previous sentences discussing the nature vs. nurture debate and the political resistance to biological explanations.

We can attempt to place the given sentence by breaking the passage down into three segments -The discussion till Blank (2) can be considered the first segment: it introduces the idea that globalization was already underway well before the industrial era. It highlights the economic interconnectedness between Chinese consumers and Southeast Asian suppliers, emphasizing that trade networks and economic reorientations were already shaping societies. The missing sentence does not fit here in Blanks (1) or (2) because the focus is on early economic exchange rather than the role of Europeans in globalization.The discussion between Blanks (2) and (3) can be labelled as the second segment: it explores how trade routes developed in the year 1000, predating Columbus’s journey. It sets up a comparison between different historical periods - 1000 and 1492 - but the idea this comparison is leading to is still unclear.&nbsp;This is where the final segment [the discussion after Blank (3)] fits in. It delivers the passage’s key argument: European involvement in global trade was not a beginning but a continuation of pre-existing systems. It reinforces the idea that the economic structures and trade routes established before 1492 were instrumental in enabling European expansion. The given sentence would best fit Blank (3) because we make a declaration ["The Europeans did not invent globalization"] and then follow&nbsp;up with information that reinforces this idea [“They changed and augmented what was already there since 1000”].&nbsp;Hence, Option D is the correct choice.&nbsp;

The passage starts by explaining how states use the DIME model in warfare, often targeting information systems first to destabilize enemies. Governments monitor communication networks, raising privacy concerns. With social media's rise, many countries employ "cyber troops" to manipulate public opinion online, spreading disinformation through tactics like paid ads.&nbsp;Option D best captures all these points.&nbsp;Option&nbsp;A:&nbsp;This option incorrectly focuses on open data policies being used to deploy cyber troops, which the passage does not emphasize.Option B: This option fails to address the key part of the passage, which is monitoring telecom data and networks.Option C: The passage does not indicate that governments conduct warfare simultaneously with military forces; rather, they act before involving the military. We can infer this from the statement,&nbsp;"Most states do everything they can to inflict pain and confusion on their enemies before deploying the military."

Option D best captures the essence of the passage. John Cleese argues that comedians need freedom to be creative and that fear of offending people or worrying about the consequences of what they say hinders their ability to be original. He highlights how modern comedians often second-guess themselves, which stifles their creativity. Option&nbsp;D&nbsp;reflects this idea, which stresses the importance of freedom and creativity in comedy, while warning against the fear that stifles innovation. Option A:&nbsp;While Cleese advocates for freedom in comedy, he doesn't say that comedians "must go where no one has gone before," which is more of an extreme interpretation than the essence of the passage. Option&nbsp;B:&nbsp;This option focuses too much on the relationship between creativity and critical thinking. The passage is more about how fear of offending hinders creativity, not about creativity being incompatible with critical thinking. Option C:&nbsp;This focuses on the "death of the art form," but Cleese's main point is about how fear of repercussions impacts creativity, not about the art form dying as such.

Evaluation of the options:Option 1: The sentence starting with "Yet each day..." would not fit here. This part is introducing Kervran’s initial observations about the hens. Inserting this sentence would feel disjointed because the paragraph hasn't yet explained the significance of the eggs.Option 2: The sentence wouldn't fit here either. The focus here is on what the hens are doing (pecking mica), and the sentence about eggs feels disconnected from this point in the narrative.Option 3: The sentence about the eggs fits perfectly here because it explains a key element of the puzzle: the hens are producing eggs with calcareous shells despite not having an obvious source of calcium. This provides a crucial piece of information that explains why Kervran was puzzled in the first place. It ties directly to the anomaly he is investigating.Option 4: It won't fit here as the paragraph has already shifted to Kervran's conclusion about the chickens transmuting one element to into another. Inserting the sentence about the eggs here would introduce new information too late, disrupting the focus on Kervran's final findings.Therefore, The sentence fits best in Option 3. It helps to explain Kervran's puzzling observations and contributes to the mystery that he's trying to solve, all while maintaining a smooth narrative flow. The other options either disrupt the flow or introduce new information too soon or too late.

Option B is the correct answer.&nbsp; This is not an externality because it was the original intended use of air-conditioning. The passage mentions that&nbsp;Carrier invented air-conditioning to ensure cool, dry air for factories with low-humidity requirements. The other options are externalities: Option A: This is an unintended consequence. CFCs were initially used in refrigeration and air-conditioning, but their long-term environmental impact (ozone depletion) was not anticipated. Option C: The Jacquard loom was originally a mechanical device for weaving patterns in fabric, but it led to the development of programmable machines, which had far-reaching effects on modern computing, which was also an unintended consequence of the loom's invention. Option D: The passage states that the phonograph was initially designed for dictation but was adapted for music recording, which was an unintended consequence.

Option B is the correct answer.&nbsp; The first paragraph discusses how&nbsp;technological or industrial advances are often accompanied by unintended consequences or secondary effects, which may not be fully understood or predictable at the time of the invention. It gives the example of the printing press, which led to unexpected developments such as the creation of spectacles, and later, the telescope and microscope. This is well captured in Option&nbsp;B. Option&nbsp;A:&nbsp;While some secondary effects may be beneficial, the focus of the paragraph&nbsp;is more on the unpredictability and far-reaching nature of these effects, rather than their inherent benefit. Option C: The paragraph doesn't advocate judging inventions by their secondary effects. Instead, it mentions&nbsp;that these effects are unpredictable and sometimes surprising. The main point is their unpredictability, not how to judge an invention. Option D: The paragraph does not suggest that&nbsp;the impact of a technological advance should be evaluated by the boost its secondary effects give to generating further technological advances.

Option B is the correct answer.&nbsp; The author mentions Carrier, Babbage, and Edison to emphasize that the inventors' original intentions were not related to the&nbsp;unexpected societal impacts their inventions had: Option A: The secondary effects are shown as surprising or leading to unforeseen societal changes, rather than leading to more inventions. Option C: The passage doesn't claim that the unintended consequences were largely beneficial. While some consequences may have been beneficial (like the telescope and microscope from the printing press), others (like climate change ) have been harmful. Option D: This is close, but it's not the main point. The intended purpose of the inventions may have been different from their actual use, but the author’s primary argument is about how the inventors could not have predicted the full societal impacts of their inventions, rather than focusing on how inventions end up being used for different purposes.

Option A is the correct answer.&nbsp; The author does not imply that recent advances are more threatening than past ones. Instead, he suggests that the nature of technological progress (with more individuals and smaller groups able to innovate) has changed, leading to new risks. The focus is not on comparing "past vs. recent" as more threatening but on the unexpected global impacts of all technological advances. Thus, option A misrepresents the author's view. Option B: The author would agree with this because the passage explains that Ethyl (leaded fuel) and Freon are examples of innovations whose unintended consequences stem from by-products they emitted (such as lead from fuel and chemicals from Freon), which had secondary effects on health and the environment. Option C: The author would support this as he mentions&nbsp;how individuals or small groups can now create innovations that have global impacts, particularly in fields like biotechnology and chemistry, which was less true in the past. Option D: The author suggests that the health threats of leaded fuel were visible earlier (in the 1920s), implying that they should have been addressed sooner.&nbsp;Hence, the author would support this

Login

CAT 2024 Slot 2 Question Paper

Instructions

Question 1.

Question 2.

Question 3.

Question 4.

Question 5.

Question 6.

Instructions

Question 7.

Question 8.

Question 9.

Question 10.